
Analysis
of aqueous humor in ocular toxoplasmosis: Detection of low avidity IgG
specific to Toxoplasma gondii.
Vinhal,
F.A.1,
Pena, J.D.O.1,
Katina, J.H.2,
Brandao, E.O.1,
Silva, D.A.O.1,
Orefice, F.2
and Mineo, J.R.1*
From the Laboratory of
Immunology,
Federal University of
Uberlândia - MG, Brazil1,
Uveitis Center, Faculty
of Medicine,
Federal University of
Minas Gerais2
SUMMARYUsing
a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that included dissociation
of antigen antibody complexes with 6M urea solution, we analyzed the avidity
of toxoplasma-specific IgG in aqueous humor and serum samples from
24 patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis. As a control, we studied
aqueous humor and serum samples from 14 cataract patients without history
of uveitis and serum samples from 10 patients with recent primary systemic
toxoplasmic infection without ocular lesion.
IgG avidity was markedly
lower in aqueous humor samples from patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
than in serum samples, despite those samples presenting higher levels of
toxoplasma-specific IgG than in serum samples.
The detection of the low-avidity
toxoplasma-specific antibodies can offer a valuable aid to make a specific
etiologic diagnosis and perhaps contribute to understand the pathogenic
mechanisms of ocular toxoplasmosis.
INTRODUCTION
Human toxoplasmosis is caused
by the intracellular protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii that
infects virtually every eucariotic cell. Because this microorganism is
ubiquitous in nature, it produces one the most common infections of humans
with approximately 500 million people throughout the world having antibodies
to this parasite (Kean 1972). Also, it is the most common cause of
retinochoroiditis worldwide in man with figures ranging from 28 to 55%
of all cases of posterior uveitis (Newman et al. 1982; O'Connor
& Hogan 1967).
The diagnosis of toxoplasmic
retinochoroiditis is based mainly on the typical clinical picture and a
positive serological test for toxoplasmosis. However, other inflammatory
processes such as tuberculosis, syphilis and candidiasis, and even noninflammatory
conditions may mimic this entity, thus emphasizing the need for an accurate
differential diagnosis (Turunen et al. 1983). In AIDS patients, any
opportunistic infection could conceivably also cause retinitis or chorioretinitis,
so it will tax the diagnostic skills of the ophthalmologist to focus the
differential diagnosis on the possibility of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis
(Holland et al. 1988; Pavesio et al. 1992; Smith 1988).
Conventional serology is
of little value in ocular toxoplasmosis because significant changes of
toxoplasma antibody levels in serum are rarely observed. In
cases where the clinical picture is atypical, or the vitreous involvement
is so marked that it obstructs the view of the fundus, or even in cases
in which other infectious diseases must be considered, studies of the
aqueous humor may be helpful. Analysis of the aqueous humor may provide
evidence of specific antibody formation by cells of the uveal tract, especially
if more antibody per unit of immunoglobulin can be detected in the aqueous
humor than in the serum (Kijlstra 1986; McCabe & Remington 1983;
O'Connor 1957; O'Connor 1974). However, the determination of
this coefficient has not been measured by standardized techniques by different
laboratories and this fact makes the interpretation of the results
difficult.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (Avidity-ELISA) which measures the antigen binding avidity of toxoplasma
specific IgG antibodies using urea to elute low avidity IgG was reported
recently (Camargo et al. 1991; Hedman et al. 1989; Joynson et al. 1990).
It was shown that serum samples from patients with acute toxoplasmosis
had low avidity IgG whereas sera from patients with chronic infection had
high avidity IgG.
In the present study we
reported the results that were obtained by using this assay for avidity
measurement of the toxoplasma specific IgG antibodies in aqueous
humor and serum samples from material diagnosed to be of toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
origin by clinical and laboratory evidence.
SUBJECTS
AND METHODS
PATIENTS
AND SAMPLES:
Forty-eight serum samples
and thirty-six aqueous humor samples from forty- eight patients were studied.
Each patient had toxoplasma-specific IgG antibody as measured by an indirect
toxoplasma IgG-ELISA, indirect IgG-immunofluorescence and passive hemagglutination
tests with titers equal or higher than 1:16. These patients were divided
into three groups based on the clinical picture as following:
-
Group I: This group consisted
of twenty four patients with acute posterior uveitis. All of these patients
presented typical lesions of recurrent active toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
and were studied from 10 days to 12 weeks after the onset of ocular symptoms.
This group consisted of thirteen males and eleven females, ranging in age
from 13 to 58 years with the mean being 26 years. One serum sample
from each patient was obtained and at the same time aqueous humor samples
from twenty three patients were obtained as described. (18)
The amount of aqueous humor obtained was approximately
200 ul per patient.
-
Group II: Fourteen cataract
patients without clinical history of uveitis were studied as controls.
This group consisted of six males and eight females ranging in age from
21 to 79 years with the mean being 46 years. One serum sample from each
patient, and aqueous humor samples from thirteen patients were obtained
as described above.
-
Group III: Ten patients with
recent primary systemic toxoplasma infection without clinical history
of ocular lesions were also studied. This group was included as positive
control of avidity assay and only serum samples were collected from these
patients.
All the serum and aqueous humor
samples were collected and preserved at -20°C until tested.
TOXOPLASMA
ANTIGEN:
Toxoplasma gondii
(RH strain) was grown intraperitoneally in Swiss mice for 48-72 hours (17)
The peritoneal exudate was obtained and the parasites were purified as
described. (17) Organisms were pelleted by centrifugation and
the pellet was suspended in distilled water and sonicated.
Solution of 1.7M NaCl was added at the same volume and the lysate was centrifugated
for 30 min at 10,000 g. The supernatant was collected for use as toxoplasma
antigen in avidity-ELISA.
AVIDITY-ELISA:
An immunoenzymatic assay
was performed to isolate low avidity IgG from immobilized parasite antigen.
(2,4) In this assay, low avidity IgG antibody
is dissociated from antigen, whereas high avidity antibodies remain bound.
For this, the toxoplasma antigen was diluted with 0.01 M Carbonate pH 9.6
and used at a concentration of 2.5 ?g protein/ml for coating ELISA PVC
microtiter plates (Hemobag, SP, Brazil). After treatment with the antigen
for 18 Hs at 4°C, the plates were washed three times with phosphate-buffered
saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST). The serum and aqueous
humor samples were diluted at 1:10 and 1:1,000 respectively and they were
applied in duplicate to the microtiter wells. After incubation for 60 min
(serum samples) or 90 min (aqueous humor samples) at 37°C, one well
of each doublet was washed (three times, 5 min each) with PBST The
other well was washed one time ( 5 min) with 6M urea dissolved in PBST
and two times (5 min each) with PBST only. The residual antigen-bound IgG
was detected with antibody to human IgG conjugated to peroxidase (type
VI, Sigma Co., St.Louis, MO) according method described by Wilson and Nakane.
(19) The conjugate was applied for 60 min at 37°C, washed
with PBST, and revealed by substrate solution consisting of 0.4 mg
of o-phenylenediamine per ml diluted in 0.1M citrate-Na2HPO4 buffer
(pH 5.5) activated by 0.005% (vol/vol) H202 . After incubation for 15 min
at room temperature, the reaction was stopped with 2N H2SO4. The intensity
of the color reaction was measured with a microwell
reader system (model 210,
Organon Teknika, Belgium) at a wavelength of 492 nm.
STATISTICS:
Two values were obtained
for each group of serum or aqueous humor samples, one for the toxoplasma
antibody washed with urea (urea+) and one for the antibody washed without
urea (urea-). The results were expressed as the mean (+/- standard
deviation) absorbance value observed for each group. The urea-treatment
ratio (U.T.R.) was calculated and expressed in percentage [A492 (urea+)
/ A492 (urea-)] x 100. The Student t test was applied
to paired or unpaired samples to compare experiments among the groups.
Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Figure 1 shows the results
obtained in the avidity ELISA of serum samples. When the toxoplasma-bound
antibodies were washed with PBS without 6M urea, the mean (+/- standard
deviation) absorbances for the groups I, II and III were .386 (+/-134),
.332 (+/-.170) and .527 (.+/-262), respectively. After wash with
6M urea-PBS, the results became .360 (+/-.152), .294 (+/-.104) and .373
(+/-.227). The comparison revealed no statistically significant differences
(p > 0.05).
Figure 2 shows the results
obtained in the avidity ELISA with aqueous humor samples. When total toxoplasma
IgG was measured, the mean (+/- s.d.) absorbance values were
.676 (+/-.262) and .172 (+/-.021) for the groups I and II, respectively.
The values for the remaining toxoplasma-bound antibodies were .509 (+/-.180)
and .164 (+/-.040). Comparison of the results of these groups revealed
significant differences between the total antibodies and the antibodies
bound to toxoplasma after washing with 6M-urea-PBS (p < 0.0001).
Figure 3 shows the urea-treatment
ratios in the avidity ELISA for serum and aqueous humor samples.
For serum samples, the UTR
values of groups I, II and III were 6.7%, 11.4%
and 29.2% respectively. Comparison of the results of groups I and
II showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.41). However,
the results obtained with both groups were significantly different when
compared with group III ( p = 0.001 and 0.012, respectively).
For aqueous humor samples,
the UTR values of groups I and II were 24.7% and 4.6%, respectively. These
results showed a significant difference (p = 0.002). The comparison
between UTR values for aqueous humor and serum samples of group I also
revealed a significant difference (p = 0.001). On the other hand,
the difference between the sera and aqueous humor values of group II
wasn't statistically significant (p = 0.49).
Fig. 1. Avidity
of toxoplasma-IgG in serum samples from patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
(Group I), cataract patients (Group II) and patients with recent primary
systemic toxoplasma infection (Group III). Antigen-bound antibodies were
washed with 6M urea solution or without urea and the antibody levels were
determined by enzyme-labelled antibody. The intensity of the reaction was
measured at 492 nm.
Fig. 2. Avidity of toxoplasma-IgG
in aqueous humor samples from patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
(Group I) and cataract patients (Group II). Antigen-bound antibodies
were washed with 6M urea solution or without urea and the antibody levels
were determined by enzyme-labelled antibody. The intensity of the reaction
was measured at 492 nm.
Fig. 3. Avidity of toxoplasma-IgG
in aqueous humor and serum samples from patients with toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
(Group I), cataract patients (Group II) and serum samples from patients
with recent primary systemic toxoplasma infection (Group III). Antigen-bound
antibodies were washed either with 6M urea (urea+) or without urea (urea-)
and the residual antigen-bound IgG was detected by enzyme-labelled antibody.
U.T.R. = ratio (urea+:urea-) of the respective intensity of the reaction
measured at 492 nm.
DISCUSSION
Only a few laboratory tests
are currently useful to the ophthalmologist in the examination of patients
with uveitis. 1 In cases of severe uveitis in which clinical
examination and laboratory testing have not provided any answers concerning
the cause, the assessment of local intraocular antibody production may
be useful. Aqueous humor analysis is now used in cases of severe uveitis
in various centers. 8 Analysis of vitreous
humor samples for local intraocular antibody production, however, has not
been widely reported probably because obtaining enough volume of
undiluted vitreous humor samples is not always easy and not always without
hazards. 1
By using the dye test, detailed
studies about the synthesis of intraocular toxoplasma antibodies have been
carried out. 6 The dye test has been widely replaced by immunoassays
in the serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis because of the inherent technical
problems of the dye test.6 To study the intraocular synthesis
of toxoplasma antibodies during ocular toxoplasmosis, a detailed
study was conducted by using a modified enzyme immunoassay. 6 The
results indicated that IgG-class anti-toxoplasma antibodies are produced
locally within the eye in cases of toxoplasmic chorioretinitis and it was
concluded that the detection of these antibodies can offer a valuable aid
to make a specific etiologic diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. However,
the quantification of the levels of antibodies to unrelated antigens offers
indirect evidence that the increased toxoplasma specific IgG antibody levels
in the aqueous humor were not a result of increased capillary permeability
or polyclonal antibody stimulation.
In our study we demonstrated
directly that IgG antibodies in aqueous humor samples from patients with
toxoplasmic chorioretinitis are different from antibodies present in their
serum samples not only in terms of level but also in terms of the avidity
to toxoplasma antigen. Despite the higher level of the toxoplasma specific
IgG
antibodies in aqueous humor samples, these molecules present lower avidity
to Toxoplasma gondii. The avidity of toxoplasma specific IgG
antibodies was measured as a function of hydrogen bond dissociation. The
hydrogen-bond disrupting agent, urea, was used to elute IgG from the immobilized
antigen. As a result, IgG antibodies of low avidity were dissociated in
conditions where high-avidity antibodies mostly have remained antigen-bound.
Recently, it was demonstrated by using sodium thiocyanate to dissociate
the antigen-antibody complexes that low-avidity antibody to retinal S-antigen
in serum samples was more prevalent in patients with acute retinal vasculitis
than in healthy subjects. 5 It was discussed that
probably the association of low-avidity antibody with normal levels of
circulating immune complexes may suggest defective regulation of antiretinal
autoimmunity and has important pathogenic implications. Nevertheless, in
that study that included subjects with ocular toxoplasmosis, it was not
measured the avidity of the IgG antibody against Toxoplasma gondii
neither in the serum nor in the aqueous humor samples. It was described
in another study that patients with ocular toxoplasmosis present lymphocyte
proliferative responses to both parasite and retinal antigens. 11
In this study, 16 (40%) of 40 patients had positive in vitro response to
the retinal S-antigen. The proliferative responses to the p22 toxoplasma
membrane antigen approached that of a crude antigen preparation of Toxoplasma
gondii. On the other hand, the response to the p30, the immunodominant
membrane antigen, was considerably less striking. They postulated that
the immune response to the p22 toxoplasma antigen may increase the risk
of developing ocular disease or a sub strain of toxoplasma with p22
as its immunodominant membrane antigen, p30, may have a greater affinity
for the retina.
Our results imply a major
difference between serum and aqueous humor samples from patients with toxoplasmic
chorioretinitis in comparison with samples from subjects without clinical
history of uveitis. Those patients present high levels of toxoplasma-specific
IgG antibodies in aqueous humor samples and these molecules present low
avidity to toxoplasma antigen.
Beyond its utility as a
diagnostic tool for specific etiologic diagnosis of toxoplasmic chorioretinitis,
the measurement of IgG-avidity in the aqueous humor may also contribute
to understand the pathogenic mechanisms of ocular toxoplasmosis.
REFERENCES
-
Baarsma, G. S., L. Luyendijk,
A. Kijlstra, J. de Vries, E. Peperkamp, D. A. E. Mertens,
and J. C. van Meurs. 1991. Analysis of local antibody production in the
vitreous humor of patients with severe uveitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 112:
147-150.
-
Hedman, K., M. Lappalainen,
I. Seppaia and O. Makela. 1989. Recent primary toxoplasma infection indicated
by a low avidity of specific IgG. J. Infect. Dis. 159: 736-740.
-
Holland, G. N., R. E. Engstrom,
Jr., B. J. Glasgow, B. B. Berger, S. A. Daniels, Y. Sidikaro, J.
A. Harmon, D. H. Fischer, D. S. Boyer, N. A. Rao, R. C. Eagle, Jr.,
A. E. Kreiger, and R. Y. Foos. 1988. Ocular toxoplasmosis in patients
with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 106: 653-667.
-
Joynson, D. H. M., R. A. Payne,
and B. K. Rawal. 1990. Potential role of IgG avidity for diagnosing
toxoplasmosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 43: 1032-1033.
-
Kasp, E., R. Whiston, D. Dumonde,
E. Graham, M. Stanford, and M. Sanders, 1992. Antibody affinity
to retinal S-antigen in patients with retinal vasculitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol.
113: 697-701.
-
Kean, B. H. 1972. Clinical toxoplasmosis:
50 years. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66: 549-571.
-
Kijlstra, A., A. C. Breebaart,
G. S. Baarsma, P. J. M. Bos, A. Rothova, L. Luyendik, M. Fortuin,
and N. J. M. Schweitzer. 1986. Aqueous chamber taps in toxoplasmic
chorioretinitis. Doc. Opthalmol. 64: 53-58.
-
Kijlstra, A., L. Luyendijk,
G. S. Baarsma, A. Rothova, C. M. C. Schweitzer, Z. Timmerman,
J. de Vries, and A. C. Breebaart. 1989. Aqueous humor analysis as
a diagnostic tool in toxoplasma uveitis. Int. Ophthalmol. 13: 383-386.
-
McCabe, R. E. and J. S.
Remington. 1983. The diagnosis and treatment of toxoplasmosis. Eur.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2: 95-104.
-
Newman, P. E., R. Ghosheh,
K. F.Tabbara, and G. R. O' Connor. 1982. The role of hypersensitivity
reactions to Toxoplasma antigens in experimental toxoplasmosis in non-human
primates. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 94: 159-164.
-
Nussenblatt, R. B., K. K. Mittal,
S. Fuhrman, S. D. Sharma, and A. G. Palestine. 1989. Lymphocyte proliferative
responses of patients with ocular toxoplasmosis to parasite and retinal
antigens. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 107: 632-641.
-
O' Connor, G. R. 1957. Anti-toxoplasma
precipitins in aqueous humor. Arch. Ophthalmol. 57: 52.
-
O' Connor, G. R. 1974.
Manifestations and management of ocular toxoplasmosis. Bull. N. Y.
Acad. Med. Soc. II, 50: 192-210.
-
O'Connor, G. R. and
M. J. Hogan. 1967. Recent developments in infectious diseases of
the retina and choroid, p. 75-90. In A. Sorsby (ed.),
Modern Trends in Ophthalmology - 1967. Butterworth, London,
England.
-
Pavesio, C. E. N., M.
L. Chiappino, P. Y. Setzer, and B. A. Nichols. 1992.Toxoplasma
gondii: differentiation and death of bradyzoites. Parasitol. Res. 78: 1-9.
-
Smith, R. E. 1988. Toxoplasmic
retinochoroiditis as an emerging problem in AIDS patients. Am. J. Ophthalmol.
106: 738-739.
-
Turunen, H. J. 1983. Detection
of soluble antigens of Toxoplasma gondii by a four-layer modification of
an enzyme immunoassay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17: 768-773.
-
Turunen, H. J., P. O. Leinikki,
and K. M. Saari. 1983. Demonstration of intraocular synthesis of immunoglobulin
G toxoplasma antibodies for specific diagnosis of toxoplasmic chorioretinitis
by enzyme immunoassay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17: 988-992.
-
Wilson, M. B. and P. K.
Nakane. 1978. Recent developments in the periodate method of conjugating
horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) to antibodies, p. 215. In W.
Knapp, K. Holubar, G. Wick (ed.) Immunofluorescence
and related techniques - 1977. North-Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam,
Holland.
Digite aqui seus
comentários e sugestões sobre este poster. Dentro de 48 horas
estarão fixados na sessão Fórum desta revista:
|